RailPro > RailPro Specific Help & Discussion

Why is it so hard for us?

<< < (4/6) > >>

G8B4Life:
I didn't expect this thread would take off like it has while I was sleeping. Perhaps I should do that more often  :) OK yes that's cheesy but I have to make fun at the time difference somehow.

I think we can all agree that most of us owe Kevin for his RailPro videos but more importantly I think Tim Ring really owes Kevin for them; They did a much better job at gaining him some sales that his own promotional material and that's not something to be sneezed at.

Both Larry and Kevin bring up good points about RailPro awareness though I'd wouldn't be worried much by a blank stare at the hobby shop; I'd simply take my RP dollars elsewhere, it's their loss not mine if they don't want to know about it.

I think Kevin is on the right track, if we want to see RP really come alive then the marketing has to be done by us, the users. It won't happen from Rings end.  I really don't know what else we can do though other than what we do already on other forums etc but an article and/or video / video article, perhaps in MRH for the widest readerbase on the upcoming RailPro Op's session on Lee's layout could be a very good thing if it can be done.

I don't know if Lee's layout has featured in MRH before or not but even if it has an article on what amount's to the wholesale conversion of a well known and established large layout to RailPro, and why RailPro and not mainstream DCC might be worth considering as well.

- Tim

melarson:

--- Quote from: Alan on June 17, 2017, 06:49:58 PM ---Another piece of evidence... consider Ring's first product was a blinking end-of-train device. The second product was a complete DCC replacement control system. That's one hell of a leap in product development. Not the course one expect an evolving product engineer to take. Unless, the leap was purchased instead of developed.

--- End quote ---

In one of my conversations with Tim last year he told me that creating the RailPro system was always his number one intent, and that producing the EOT devices was the way to raise the capital.  From our point of view it may seem to be quite a leap, but in fact it was not.  The leap was backward, creating something simple but profitable so he could fund the development of the control system he originally envisioned (in the context of our conversation, I never got the impression that it was purchased).

So I would like to add a big thank you to all of those freight train modelers out there that helped fund the system we all enjoy today!

Michael

Antoine L.:
This thread questions: What are we truely waiting for?
New sounds? Are the bugs really altering our experience of the product?

Personnally, Railpro does everything I ever wanted from a control system and even does more. The nice-to-have extra features Ring is working on will come eventually, but I cannot really complain about the product I own. It runs my trains the way I want and I am happy.

We actually -knew- when buying RP that updates would come slowly. I am pretty sure most of us also doubted a bit before buying: "What happens if the company goes belly up?" So we knew, and we bought it anyway, cause RP is great and works almost flawlessly in its current state.

Not my intent to kill the thread, just throwing in my two cents.

Antoine

Alan:
Right with ya Antoine. On the previous page I posted


--- Quote ---I think it is safe to conclude Ring Engineering is simply a bit weak when it comes to marketing and a bit slow with product development. I can live with both. My trains are running just fine.
--- End quote ---

Your statement pretty much sums up the RailPro experience for everybody


--- Quote ---It runs my trains the way I want and I am happy.
--- End quote ---

Maybe that should be the RailPro marketing slogan.

Lee Nicholas:
I have to chime in here.

I for one have no issues with RP or Tim. I speak with him on a regular basis almost weekly and I can assure you he has some new releases coming out very soon and some of the changes I have beta tested and they are great. Tim is very protective of RP and as you have seen he patents most everything which takes time so have patience. My previous system Rail Lynx which I ran for 25 years had  little or no improvements in that time but worked great because it was direct communication with locomotive just like RP.  I switched to RP and feel I have hit the mother load and couldn't be happier.

Today I have a couple coming to do another video on the UCW. They were here last fall for the first installment which has been up and running on YouTube for several months and we have over 20,000 hits. Since they were here I have switched to RP and have will give it a major promotion today as we film the layout under operation. His videos are listed under Toy Man go check them out.

I'm a little disappointed in the community response to my invitation for a Sept meet. I've had 3 responses so far and was hoping for more takers as I would like to meet the RP user community hopefully we'll see a few more in the next month or so.

I am excited to be part of the RP family.

Lee Nicholas

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page