General > General Discussion
Sound Familiar?
Alan:
--- Quote ---I hate to be the first one but then I have an asbestos suit that hasn't seen any action in a long time.
--- End quote ---
Darryl, good thing you have that suit. The DCC crowd really dig their heels in when challenged. Drink plenty of water.
TomO:
I almost responded yesterday when I read the forum at MRH. Decided not to start a flame war so didn't. The responses you guys made were very well thought out comments and didn't destroy any other systems. Straight forward to what the strengths are for RailPro, I salute you.
TomO
G8B4Life:
I'm surprised the naysayers and bashers without anything else to say but "it's not for me" and "It's not DCC" haven't turned up in droves yet to our responses.
I'm really really surprised someone from the US mentioned the ESU ECoS system. From what I saw a couple of years ago it's quite impressive but boy if people think the cost of RailPro is high compared to DCC then they might not want to look and see what ECoS costs!
Interesting post though, contained some very good points. It shows the state of laurel resting instead of innovation on the part of North American DCC system manufacturers.
- Tim
William Brillinger:
--- Quote ---Darryl, good thing you have that suit.
--- End quote ---
Darryl, I may need to borrow that suit.
G8B4Life:
--- Quote from: William Brillinger on July 26, 2017, 09:33:05 AM ---Darryl, I may need to borrow that suit.
--- End quote ---
Nice one pointing out the proprietary in DCC Bill. I seem to recall making a small rant about that being my #1 beef here not long ago and there you go, less than a week later someone pulls that myth out of the hat. Might point out that DCC decoders are propriety too, as long as it responds to the NMRA DCC signal and has at least the minimum quotient of NMRA CV's you can do whatever else you like with them which can be proprietary, which they have (transponding, RailCom, high CV's etc).
- Tim
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version