RailPro > RailPro Specific Help & Discussion

Stay Alive Circuitry

<< < (3/10) > >>

SD90:

--- Quote from: William Brillinger on July 25, 2016, 03:44:10 PM ---There is no current offering for keep alive from Ring, but the new LM3's do support adding such a device natively.
I have not tried it myself yet, but the LM3 does have inputs for it and it should work with existing K-A technology.

--- End quote ---

Hmmm

melarson:

--- Quote from: William Brillinger on July 25, 2016, 03:44:10 PM ---There is no current offering for keep alive from Ring, but the new LM3's do support adding such a device natively.
I have not tried it myself yet, but the LM3 does have inputs for it and it should work with existing K-A technology.

--- End quote ---
I emailed Tim today (Monday) to ask for clarification on how to wire a keep-alive/battery to the new LM-3, given it's one new connection (simply labeled "negative" with no explanation).  Hopefully he'll send a response tomorrow (Tuesday).  I will keep this list informed.

TwinStar:
I emailed him today asking if it will work with the LM-2's. But, now I'm wondering if there is no such hardware but only the capability with the -3.

Jacob

TwinStar:
From Tim:

Hi Jacob,

We do not recommend connecting other manufactures products to ours.  You could damage either our product or theirs and the worst case would be that you cause a fire.  However, at your own risk, you could connect a DCC keep alive to a LM-3 since it has a negative terminal.  If the DCC keep alive can withstand track voltage you could connect the most negative wire to the 'negative' terminal on the LM-3 and the positive wire to the blue wire on the 9 pin connector.  Connecting to the blue wire will bypass some of the LM-3 internal circuit protection and can cause more damage to the LM-3 if there is an internal short (not likely - but not impossible either).

We do plan to make a RailPro keep alive but it is not expected to be available real soon. We expect our keep alive to work with all RailPro modules (LM-1, LM-2, LM-3).

Please let us know if you have any more questions.

Thank you for contacting Ring Engineering!

melarson:
This morning I received an answer from Tim regarding yesterday's inquiry into wiring the LM-3 to a keep-alive or a battery, and my question about when he thought Ring's keep-alive would be available.

On running on battery:

--- Quote ---"To connect a battery to a LM-3 it would be best to connect the negative
battery wire to the 'negative terminal' on the 6 pin connector and the
battery positive to the red wire on the 9 pin connector."

--- End quote ---

For me at least, since I have a steamer that I plan to run fully on battery power, and given Tim's answer, I think I'll stick with connecting the battery leads to the rail leads (red and black on the 9-pin) and not mess with the new negative lead.  That way all I am doing is replacing the DC supply that normally comes through the rails with an onboard DC supply.  I get that connecting it according to his suggestion probably eliminates one forward voltage drop (approx 0.65V) across the internal rectifier, but I wonder what else it might bypass (see next quote).

On using an existing DCC keep-alive:

--- Quote ---"We do not recommend connecting other manufactures products to ours.   
You could damage either our product or theirs and the worst case would be
that you cause a fire.  However, at your own risk, you could connect a
DCC keep alive to a LM-3s since it has a negative terminal.  If the DCC
keep alive can withstand track voltage you could connect the most
negative wire to the 'negative' terminal on the LM-3 and the positive
wire to the blue wire on the 9 pin connector.  Connecting to the blue
wire will bypass some of the LM-3 internal circuit protection and can
cause more damage to the LM-3 if there is an internal short (not likely
- but not impossible either)."

--- End quote ---

This leads me to the conclusion that I will wait for Ring's keep-alive product.  Using theirs, unforeseen problems will be covered by Ring.  I can't afford to replace LM-3S modules because I ignored the risks.

And on the subject of Ring's keep-alive:

--- Quote ---"We do plan to make a RailPro keep alive but it is not expected to be
available real soon. "

--- End quote ---

I am bummed that the keep-alive still doesn't have a target release date, and the release of said product seems to be getting pushed off further and further.  Any hope I had of it coming out soon is pretty well dashed.  But, they say patience is a virtue.  Sometimes, I'm not terribly virtuous.   ;)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version