RailPro > RailPro Specific Help & Discussion
RAILPRO LONGEVITY
Tom:
I selected RailPro without much investigation into DCC for a small startup HO model railroad because it seemed to be more technologically robust. Much has been posted here about RailPro vs. DCC and one of the more significant negatives is concern with how long Ring will stay in business, tempered with the suggestion that the downside is minimal in that without Ring one may eventually be forced to buy a DCC power supply and/or DCC controller to keep running LM modules.
I have no recollection of how I even ran across RailPro while looking for options, but I obviously did:
• I am wondering how Ring markets RailPro products since I have not noticed any advertising and often the products are omitted from generalized internet searches that should identify them?
• And, since existing RailPro users would seem to have a vested interest in seeing it grow, I am curious as to what RPUG members do, or could do, beyond word of mouth to promote their own interests? A very large portion of model railroaders are heavily invested in the old DCC, resist new technologies (possibly due to marginal gains vs. expense), and definitely promote their interests (I have experienced it).
Tom
Alan:
A RailPro module is essentially no different than a DCC module with respect to interoperability and basic functionality. Therefore, Ring going out of business would be no different than Digitrax or NCE going out of business. Ring has been in business a long time although years in business means very little. As an example I direct you to General Electric or Sears.
I am doubtful RailPro owners, regardless of how hard they may try, can positively impact Ring's sales in any meaningful way. Sure, suggest it to a buddy or show it to the club but even if everyone you speak to about RailPro bought a system your contribution is but a drip in the ocean of sales Ring needs to remain a viable business. The product is strong. Few who try it abandon it. Ring's customer service is personal and second to none. As long as Ring continues to introduce new products and features I believe the company will do well.
Tim Ring is an engineer. He is not a marketer or promoter. It appears he doesn't allocate a lot of time or money to marketing. He does advertise in Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine. It is quite possible he is very happy at his current sales volume. More is not always better.
darryl.trains:
I too, have wondered about the lack or little advertising. I just happened one day not too long ago to read an article about RailPro. I was thinking how come I never saw anything even though this system had been around for quite a spell? I have subscribed to a good number of model train magazines but missed the ads because I wasn't aware or even looking for something better with control of everything on a layout or at least most of it. I was getting kind of miffed at the limitation of DCC but no other place to go. I have found of the many years of my life that some folks are great at developing products but do not seem to figure out how to promote the product or maybe don't care or satisfied as it stands? For instance I know there would be a big market for N scale modules as I have been asked by members of the club I belong to plus others that are their own. Maybe N scale modules can't be made?
Oh well, "it is what it is".
I am very happy here that I was lucky to find RP and this website.
TOF in Arid-Zona for the most part. :) 8)
Dean:
I have a lot of money tied up in DCC equipment. When I started reading about RailPro I decided to add it to my DCC system. You can really tell how in inferior DCC is when you run it side by side with RailPro.
I think other DCC users would add RailPro if they knew they could run it alongside inferior DCC.
emd_16645:
I think Dean hits the nail on the head for most DCC users. Those who have made significant investments into DCC are reluctant to abandon that investment. At this point, I have not invested significantly in Railpro, I have far more locomotives equipped with DCC than Railpro. I also have DCC command stations. For now, I am mostly using RP as a means to upgrade locos with sound, then running them side by side with DCC. Over time, the DCC chips will be replaced with RP as funding and use allows or dictates.
Currently I am preparing to dismantle my layout prior to moving. I am developing a modular layout for my next residence. For cost savings I plan to continue the DCC/RP combo, but the total roster will be much smaller than my previous layout concept, so full RP conversion could happen sooner than later. Right now, the big deterrent for me actually is investing in a HC-2 (or two). Hopefully I can pick one up soon, anyone looking to off load one cheap? :P
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version