RailPro User Group

General => General Discussion => Topic started by: TwinStar on July 16, 2019, 08:09:45 AM

Title: Amrit By LocoFi
Post by: TwinStar on July 16, 2019, 08:09:45 AM
This looks interesting. Is the 12V too low for RailPro?

https://www.wifimodelrailroad.com/product-page/bupahb-amrit-uninterrupted-power-supply-for-locofi-locomotives
Title: Re: Amrit By LocoFi
Post by: G8B4Life on July 16, 2019, 08:35:40 AM
Is the 12V too low for RailPro?

Nope. RP will operate lower than that but you will get the low voltage warning. Looking at the specs:


it should work without any issue on RP; the max input voltage is way more than RP can put out, the current rating more than enough for a good motor plus sound and light (RP is 2A stall, 1A continuous) and the output voltage will be the same as whatever RP is outputting (~14v).

- Tim
Title: Re: Amrit By LocoFi
Post by: Tom on August 01, 2019, 10:33:11 AM
I guess this is the equivalent of a keep-alive.

Which is less space intensive, keep-alive or LocoFi?

Any pluses or minuses on installation of keep-alive vs. LocoFi?

I seem to recall that a keep-alive is a problem in a LM-2S, but not a LM-3S.  I think it may have had something to do with running on DCC.  Anyway, is there any problem with the LocoFi using either a LM-2S or LM-3S?
Title: Re: Amrit By LocoFi
Post by: William Brillinger on August 01, 2019, 12:12:40 PM
I believe a KA-1 or 2 will be a lot smaller than this, and is only $21 each including shipping. The KA-3 or 4 will be just a bit smaller and still only $21 each.

The KA can be used with an LM-2 if you wire it using my instructions for installing with a bridge rectifier.

https://rpug.pdc.ca/index.php/topic,350.msg2604.html#msg2604
Title: Re: Amrit By LocoFi
Post by: TwinStar on August 01, 2019, 03:32:51 PM
The Amrit has a much greater power supply though with the ability to power a locomotive up to 5 minutes versus 5-7 seconds.
Title: Re: Amrit By LocoFi
Post by: TwinStar on August 01, 2019, 03:33:57 PM
I guess this is the equivalent of a keep-alive.

Which is less space intensive, keep-alive or LocoFi?

Any pluses or minuses on installation of keep-alive vs. LocoFi?

I seem to recall that a keep-alive is a problem in a LM-2S, but not a LM-3S.  I think it may have had something to do with running on DCC.  Anyway, is there any problem with the LocoFi using either a LM-2S or LM-3S?

No, it really isn't. A Keep-Alive or similar will power a locomotive in the second range, generally 3-9, whereas this can power a locomotive for up to 5 minutes. This is a significant leap in capability.